Wayne’s world of woes …
… is a lot different to the real one!
This ‘doom & gloom’ article appeared at the top of page 26 in yesterday’s Melbourne Herald Sun, the largest daily newspaper in the country. It quotes the President of the Bright Chamber of Commerce, Wayne Phillips, extensively. According to Wayne, Bright’s tourist trade, shops & businesses are cactus, but what he’s saying is wrong – in so many ways. Here is the full text with Wayne’s words of woes highlighted:
Comment:
OK, things are tough (everywhere) but to portray Bright as ‘Struggletown’ and our residents as ‘poor’ is not the way to go. And it’s not exactly right either. I have to wonder why the President of the Chamber of Commerce would talk the town down so much. Does he think this will make Melburnians take pity on us and come up and spend more money? Or maybe they’ll just send some food parcels, it sounds like we need them.
Or, as I suspect, was Wayne wearing his other (conflicting) ’hat’ as the principal officer of the anti-Coles (anti-the world) Save Bright Action Group when he made those comments? Let’s analyse them anyway:
“Interest rates & fuel prices are directly to blame”
Well yes, those things don’t help but are they SOLELY to blame for a few business closures and the state of our economy? And is it really that bad? I don’t think so, but that’s what Wayne seems to be saying. The fact is our tourist numbers have been declining for years and, in my opinion, it’s mainly due to two things: (1) Lack of infrastructure improvements to the Bright CBD & surrounds (2) Lack of promotion. What has Wayne done to address those issues?
“Unleaded petrol was $1.80 and diesel $1.90 in Bright last weekend …”
No, unleaded wasn’t that high, but thanks for discouraging our potential visitors even more than necessary.
“Freight companies had put a 25% fuel levy on everything trucked into town”
So does everything here costs 25% more than elsewhere? That’s not the case but that’s how Wayne has said it.
“Some businesses have closed and (as for) those that haven’t closed we have a very high rate of businesses on the market …”
We’ve always had a lot of businesses for sale. That is the nature of a tourist town, people come and people go. Wayne’s only been here 5 years himself after moving from the Geelong area so perhaps he’s not aware of our transient business history. As for the closures, well the town had two butcher shops, which is unusual for a town this size considering meat is also sold at the supermarket, so it’s not really surprising that one has closed. Two restaurants have closed also but (from all reports) one of those seems more due to poor management – it’s also about to re-open under new owners. We’ve still got a lot of restaurants and doesn’t Wayne know that it’s standard throughout the entire world that very few restaurants survive for 5 years? Perhaps he should watch Ramsay. And yes, a small sandwich shop closed but that was a few months ago before the petrol jump and they had been struggling for years and were often not open. I don’t want to make light of the economic problems we face but Wayne is blowing it out of proportion. Geez, and I bet those who are trying to sell are real grateful for Wayne telling potential buyers not to bother coming here.
“… we’re one of the lowest incomes per household in all of regional Victoria.”
Why is Wayne making Bright sound like the Moe of the north east by distorting the facts so much? Those figures are for the shire, not for Bright, and they include Myrtleford, which IS facing genuine problems due to the tobacco closure. They also include Mt Beauty, which has a high proportion of welfare recipients. And here in Bright we have one of the highest rates of retired people in regional Victoria and they are on pensions, which also brings the average income figure down. But people in Bright are not ’skint’ and guess what? We have nearly full employment. What is Wayne trying to do, scare new arrivals off too? I can’t think of any other reason he’d distort the facts so much.
“They (a lot of business owners) can’t go back to the banks any more”
I’m surprised that Wayne seems to know the personal financial details, equity and balance sheets of so many businesses in town. They must trust him a lot to give out that information. So are our four banks going to close too? I don’t think so (yes we’re so poor that our town of about 3,000 people, or 5,000 in the greater area, supports four banks!)
“Basically they’re thinking it’s time to close up and move on.”
Maybe Wayne should just speak for himself … well, maybe he is!
In my opinion Wayne has been too pre-occupied for the past 18 months with his anti-progress Save Bright group fighting the Coles supermarket proposal. He can be a protester and ’slow town’ promoter if he likes (that’s his prerogative) but quite frankly, I don’t think that sits very well with the role as President of the Chamber of Commerce. In fact I didn’t rejoin the Chamber this year because I have no confidence in its executive … none whatsoever.
I also have to wonder what impact this article might have on Bright’s house prices. Who’d want to buy in Bright after reading that? It doesn’t take a big shift in demand to drastically affect house prices. If only 20 potential buyers are deterred that might equate to a 25% drop in demand … and prices. Negative talk like that can have huge ramifications and it does this town a great disservice.
There’s no point complaining though, about things that are out of our control like petrol prices and interest rates. A wise man once told me “don’t worry about things you cannot control, focus on what you CAN control and do something about it.”
And what we can control is the promotion, marketing and (most importantly) the presentation of the town. We could also put some events on – we have none in winter! What have Wayne and the Chamber done about that? Well, not a lot in my opinion.
I’d like to hear some positive plans because otherwise it’s lay down and die. I think we need an alternative to the Chamber of Commerce – a Bright Tourism Association perhaps – made up of positive people!




Contact: ray@grevilleagardens.com
Click
I’m not sure a split is a good idea. It happened in he King Valley. We originally had the ‘King Valley Tourism Association’ (KVTA) that attracted both state and federal funding to promote local tourism.
For some unknown reason (internal catfighting?), the wine industry established it’s own marketing organisation and split from the tourism association. That left the minimal accommodation industry that we have out in the cold.
Now most of the state and federal funding is won by the wine industry and the KVTA has nowhere to turn. Don’t make the same mistake!
An option that I had been thinking through – but will now have no chance to follow through – was to create a ‘Peak Body’ of ratepayers throughout the Rural City of Wangaratta to promote local (as in Bright) interests.
It was envisaged that throughout the RCoW, different communities would form their own chapter made up of representatives of the already existing sporting, tourism, business and community groups.
The chapters would establish local priorities. The ‘Peak Body’ of chapters would establish overall priorites and being the representation of all of the ratepayers would have the authority to demand to be heard by local, state and federal governments.
Just an idea!
I’m not talking about a “split” from the Chamber Greg, I’m talking about dumping it and replacing it with a more objective & focused body to promote Bright & to come up with new events. The Chamber is all but redundant around here and nearly folded anyway late last year.
Ray,
Firstly Fuel (Diesel) was $1.92 last week – I know as I filled up my car at the local Shell Servo.
I agree with your comments – when I read the article, I thought our town sounded like a bunch of Hillbillies. Whereas in fact we are quite the opposite. We are not low income earners as stated. There are numerous people who are quite wealthy in the township – yet they dont drive flash cars and pretend to be high flyers.
I find it odd that Mr Feltrin appears in the photo – as he told me on the last night of his business operating that his heart was no longer in the business and he did not want those feelings reflecting in his work. He also stated it was difficult to sell the business and no one really came forward with a firm offer. Isn’t that common with hospitality? Why would you buy a resturant in Bright and pay large sums of money for them, when it is cheaper to start your own. Also – there are other businesses on the market.
As for Wayne, I cannot believe that he would say those words about our town – he is our chamber president and should be talking the town up in press. Not only that – he failed to mention the many attractions and activities of Bright and our area.
As for Mr Sullivan – how can he complain? The only main supermarket in town.
I think the BOYS wanted their mug shot in the Herald Sun!
Correct me if I am wrong – but I believe Noel Stone is the Myrtleford Chamber President? I would bet he would never talk Myrtleford down like these guys have…….
Andrew, I was President of the MCC about 10 years ago. Geoff Scott now holds the reins and I know he is very vocal about seeing our town progress and grow despite its setbacks.
Just on your C of C, I couldn’t help but read their “Chamber Chat” column in this weeks paper where the article talked about making Bright a “Cittaslow” – a place which sets out to become a “Slow City”. The concept started in Italy and follows the general philosophy adopted by the Slow Food movement.
Admirable though the idea might be, one cannot help but think that the suggestion mirrors more the attitude of the Chamber President and those behind the Save Bright push, given that the article coincides with the negative sentiments expressed in the Herald-Sun story.
The Chamber’s timing could have been better!
Sorry about that Noel!
Couldn’t agree more with you.
We (meaning Bright, Myrtleford, Mt Beauty) should be promoting our wonderful area, not giving out false info.
Perhaps to the BOYS defence, the author of the article did not state any positive facts the BOYS may have said – I guess we will find out.
I wonder how much this is about positioning themselves (or a couple of them) for November?
That’ll be fun.
Good point Dawson, by then though, the VCAT decision should well and truly be through.
I still believe that we should be encouraging people to come here – not discourage – even in the current economic climate.
I imagine that Wayne Phillips may cop some abuse over the article. I wouldn’t be too pleased about the situation should I be involved in the tourist trade.
Andrew, yes but unleaded was about $1.675 – small point but it gave the impression unleaded in Bright is 20c plus higher than Melbourne, which is not true – sometimes we’re even cheaper.
Everyone I’ve spoken to is appalled that Wayne would be so negative about Bright. It’s not the first time he’s run us down in the media either. Earlier this year he made very similar comments when being interviewed by Kathy Bedford on her ABC radio Statewide program. It was about the Coles issue and he brought up the “lowest avg income” business again. He also said the situation where a lot of people shop in Myrtleford instead of Bright was OK by him. Strange attitude for a Bright Chamber President (although he didn’t tell Bedford he was the Pres of the Chamber, as he was speaking for Save Bright! What a conflict of interests that is)
Btw, I wouldn’t give him the benefit of the doubt. If he did say anything positive it was obviously outweighed by the crap. Look at how much he’s said that’s extremely negative, as I’ve highlighted in the clipping above.
Noel, you’re right about Cittaslow being wrong for Bright. I spoke at Tuesday’s council meeting AGAINST it. I think it’s possibly OK for some places but not for a town like Bright. I won’t divert into that just yet but I’ll write more about the whole Cittaslow issue later.
Dawson, yeah, I fear you might be right.
My info is that there has been an emergency meeting of the Chamber and that Wayne has stepped down as Chair.
Yes, I heard that this afternoon and I’ve confirmed it. Post on its way.
I personally know someone who works in a job network office in the shire, and Bright does has the highest number of welfare recipients in the shire. Not Mount Beauty, and not Myrtleford, but Bright. Thats a fact. There are as many retrired people , self funded and also pensioners who own their own homes in Mount Beauty as Bright. There are more younger people in Bright who are transient and Bright attracts people from all over Australia who then look for work ( why they dont do their researh before moving is anyone’s guess) and these people become welfare recipients as the jobs are not there for the unskilled, aqnd many people mobing to Bright are unskilled. They are looking for ‘reception’ and ‘legal reception’ and ‘manager’ positions as well as rocket scientist openings, and refuse o work in more menial jobs, so they go on welfare.
This can be verified by Centrelink. The town with the highest number of welfare recipients, is Bright. The town with the most unemployed. . is Bright. The town with the most unemployable welfare recipients is Bright. The fascade of big showy houses is a fascade also , . many are rentals. . owned by out of town people. Bright may look affluent but thats a small percentage, it has high unemployment, high drug useage, high alcohol abuse, and the highest number of long term unemployed. So there we have it in a nutshell , figures one can obtain through various government departments, and as much as I hate to admit it, Wayne was right in this instance.
Wow, you sure went back and dug up an old post. Yes, Wayne might’ve been right after all. The town of Bright is well down and, unfortunately, no one seems prepared to do anything about it.