What’s your problem mate, can’t stand to see the Libs in opposition where they f*cking belong? Seems so.

You don’t debate, you don’t discuss, you just sneer and cast aspersions without foundation. You sound just like …… a f*cking Liberal !!!

Comments are off on this topic – thanks to you, boyo.

Would you let any one go through all your personal computers based on accusation? That my read on it as far as Malcolm Turnbull is concerned. His Work station is different, as far as I know he is fully co-operating.

“I’ll just pack up and take freedom of speech with me”

Yeah, I shouldn’t have censored you!

Seriously if you prefer I didn’t visit just let me know. I’ll just pack up and take freedom of speech with me.

Something those of your ilk do with great aplomb.

I only read about this today and was going to respond to you Stuart, but I’m afraid that anyone who calls me “of your ilk” doesn’t get a response.

Yeah, we’re all related down here. Very original.

This blog is definitely going pear shaped. All because of your wanking that is. Now f – - k off and get over it.

That was merely me being fed up with your constant diversion away from the real issue of Turnbull’s (possible) involvement in the fake email. I couldn’t care less if you answer it or not, just stop banging on about so-called accusations that clearly have no substance in order to divert attention away from Liberal Party antics. OK?

I’m going to close the comments on this soon, it’s going in circles. And no, you haven’t made any relevant points. Perhaps focus on the issue and not the comment maker.

“Anyway answer the Key Question or go to bed” That’s a demand Ray. Thats how you ended your blog.

I’m not “demanding”you answer it, is how you started your next.

I’m happy to let your readers decide if that’s hypocrisy or not.

For your information, I don’t class myself as a “lefty”. I’m certainly not a right winger either but I am conservative on some matters and more “alternative” on others. I’m also a capitalist & opportunist (and proud of it).

Most of all I pride myself with a sense of what’s right and what’s wrong, and what IS a real issue and what is not.

In this case the small matter of there being some sort of communication between Swan and Grant is insignificant and inconsequential.

But Turnbull’s reliance on a faked email and his connection to the strange character Godwin Grech behind the thing, IS significant.

You don’t bring the reputation of the PM and the Treasurer into question on flimsy evidence. And if you do it on faked evidence you’re a dud.

1. The email was a fake
2. They have no case to answer
3. But Turnbull does.

Allison Ritchie is Carol Brown’s niece, not the other way round. Your point? They were both elected, one didn’t employ the other. And Mr Sheen’s greatest asset is probably still that he isn’t John Howard, but he’ll do for now. At least HIS judgment seems sound.

Off to work now, more later.

Yes it does. It’s not ambiguous and it’s not hard, yet you still won’t answer it.

John Grant, … gave … Kevvy a ute for nothing

He lent it too him but even so, it was declared as a political donation. So what?

Swanny might have done a favour, for … John Grant

Really? And what did Grant get? Are you serious? Do you believe Swan & Rudd would jeopardise their careers for a two bit car salesman? Don’t be stupid.

Anyway, answer the key question or go to bed.