Alpine Opinion

Palin resigns

Posted in Politics, World events by Ray Dixon on 4 July, 2009

Yeah, it makes sense to me !!! What a wacko.

Tagged with: ,
24 comments

24 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. jr said, on 4 July, 2009 at 5:42 pm

    “No, she’s a wacko of the highest order, a real brainless twit.”

    Is there a hint of twitter in that, Raymond?

  2. roxannatas said, on 4 July, 2009 at 5:55 pm

    I’m still getting beyond Hurray!

  3. Brokenleftleg said, on 4 July, 2009 at 7:18 pm

    Three types of people are desperate for her to run for president in 2012.
    1. Democrats
    2. Republicans without any brains
    3. Political satirists.

    That third group will be getting so much content provided free of charge in she runs.

  4. Ray Dixon said, on 4 July, 2009 at 7:33 pm

    I think there’s more to this, BLL, than her desire to run for President, as Rox alluded to under the other post (Friday night flop). Why would she need to step down now if that’s what she wants to do? I think she’s in some kind of trouble for something a bit, er, not so kosher.

  5. Baldrick said, on 4 July, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    She ate vegetables?

  6. Brokenleftleg said, on 4 July, 2009 at 9:07 pm

    She’s run off to join a Lesbian devil worshipping circus?

  7. Ray Dixon said, on 4 July, 2009 at 9:10 pm

    Probably related to money.

  8. Bertus said, on 4 July, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    The American blogosphere is buzzing with this (per confessions on PP):

    http://thinkprogress.org/2009/07/03/palin-hockey-arena-scandal/

  9. Ray Dixon said, on 4 July, 2009 at 11:21 pm

    Sounds very feasible, Bertus. That sort of thing goes on all the time even at our own local council levels. A building firm gets a major council contract and the mayor or some executive gets some free building work on their home. Hmm, I’ve heard a lot of rumours about things like that around here too so I certainly wouldn’t put it past her.

  10. Orville_B_Croft said, on 5 July, 2009 at 12:19 am

    Hope we see her again.

  11. Bertus said, on 5 July, 2009 at 1:16 am

    I mean, she can’t possibly be running for POTUS. It’s more than three years out. How does she know she’d even get nominated? How does she know she’ll still be well and/or keen or that nothing else will have changed? How does she know that a much stronger candidate won’t emerge from the woods (the way Obama did)?

    A proven way to make a run for POTUS is to be IN a State Governor’s job until as late in the campaign as possible. Shows people you can do the job, you’re tough enough, you’re popular etc. Call it the Ronnie Raygun Method.

    So I reckon it has to be something else, and that means either scandal, or some lucrative deal, maybe a TV deal of some sort. FWIW.

  12. Ray Dixon said, on 5 July, 2009 at 8:02 am

    Well the way she was talking and the things she said suggested that she was under some kind of pressure and/or investigation. So the ‘free house building’ rumour would seem to fit. We’ll see. She’ll never get the nomination to run for President. Even the Republicans aren’t that stupid. Although ….

  13. Orville_B_Croft said, on 5 July, 2009 at 8:49 am

    Balance, Ray balance. Having studied the whole US political scene, Palin is a great match of the fumbling Obama.
    “I can see Russia from my house” ROFL

    Either way, they’re screwed.

  14. Ray Dixon said, on 5 July, 2009 at 8:53 am

    Well I agree that the US faces a very bleak future, Orville, regardless of who’s running the show. Hopefully it’ll be mostly isolated to them and the impacts not so great here – which seems to be the case so far.

  15. jr said, on 5 July, 2009 at 9:48 am

    Well, here’s my bit of balance. All the artificial economy stimulation will eventually run out of steam, after which the whole mess will implode.

    Then we’ll have all this fabulous mineral wealth and very few, if any, customers to sell it to.

    That’s when the real depression will kick in.

    From the look of it, there are still many trillions of dollars in toxic debt fermenting away in banks. Tick, tick, tick …

    Look out McDonalds, soup kitchens will be the new wave of “dining out”.

  16. Ray Dixon said, on 5 July, 2009 at 10:06 am

    Balance? Mate, if you’re right we should sell up right now (for whatever we can get), live in a caravan for a year or two and then come out and clean up when all the prices are at rock bottom.

    Sorry JR, I don’t subscribe to the doom & gloom, depression-type predictions.

  17. Bertus said, on 5 July, 2009 at 10:18 am

    jr – well, I sure hope you’re wrong. Seems to me if you talk to five economists you get ten different opinions about what’s going on. Some respected people don’t think we’ll even see a recession, while others agree with you.

    On America, here’s the latest happy tidings out of California:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/8129840.stm

    Some of the stories under “See Also” on the R/H side make cheery reading too.

  18. Ray Dixon said, on 5 July, 2009 at 10:46 am

    I won’t read it, Bertus. It’s too “depressing”.

    I actually believe the old adage of ‘when America sneezes we catch a cold’ is no longer apt and hasn’t been for a long time. America’s real estateindustry (which is where all these problems started) has always been crazy and in no way correlated to ours. The Yanks don’t understand real estate investment and are more into ‘flipping’ and short term rip off stuff than sensible investment. Also, the percentage of home ownership has always been quite low compared to ours. The imbalance in wealth distribution in the US is like in 3rd world countries. I know we have our disadvantaged and underclasses here, but it’s never been anything like what it is in the US.

    Now I realise that these ‘toxic debts’ were packaged up and on-sold to the dumb arses of the world (a town in Norway comes to mind) but I don’t think any of that directly or even indirectly impacts us greatly. Our banks were on the originating side and got a bit burnt initially but they wrote that off in 2007/08 and now they’re well & truly in the clear and steaming ahead with their obscene profits.

    Some people say that when the overseas banks implode, as they’ve been doing, that’ll mean there won’t be any money left for Australian companies and Govts to borrow. I don’t agree. You see, the thing is that capital never goes up in smoke, never disappears, it just changes hands and that means that what we are seeing is a wealth shift. Those with the money will continue to lend it but they’ll wait until the opposition is flattened.

  19. Vijay said, on 5 July, 2009 at 11:11 am

    Is it only me or does it seem that all her sentences seem disconnected…(the err, umm etc)?

  20. Ray Dixon said, on 5 July, 2009 at 11:15 am

    Vijay, it’s not only you. And they’re not only disconnected, they’re totally incoherent. She uses all the wrong metaphors and what she ends up saying at the end of a statement has nothing to do with what she started saying. She’s a real scatterbrain and only in America could someone of her low level of intellect reach such high office. But not President … although George W wasn’t a lot better!

  21. ralphmagyar said, on 5 July, 2009 at 12:41 pm

    I’ve just listened to Sarah Palin’s video. I think she made it clear she intends to take over Mother Teresa’s orphanage in India and from there save the troops in Kosovo by creating a basketball team coached by someone else. Does she write her own stuff?

  22. Ray Dixon said, on 5 July, 2009 at 12:54 pm

    You can’t write that stuff. She just opens her mouth and out it comes.

  23. jr said, on 5 July, 2009 at 5:43 pm

    Ralphmagyar, she’s threatening to sue people like you. Mind you, she’s gonna be a busy little girl then.

    That resignation address really reflects on the average intelligence over there.

  24. ralph said, on 16 July, 2009 at 7:55 pm

    “Sarah Palin is the definition of irrational, a volatile and scattered country-music queen without the music. Her Republican fans defend her lack of application and intellect, happy to settle for her emotional electricity”

    quote from Maureen Dowd columnist New York Times 14 July 2009


Leave a Reply