Alpine Opinion

Bundanoon’s ban on bottled water

Posted in Bright Australia, Uncategorized by Ray Dixon on 9 July, 2009
Bundanoon seems similar to Bright - in more ways than one.

Bundanoon seems similar to Bright - in more ways than one.

Town’s decision based on revenge and small-town mentality accidentally puts it on the map!

The national & international media is abuzz with the news  that the  tiny NSW Southern Highlands tourist town of Bundanoon has voted to ban the sale of bottled water, attracting attention from around the world.

While ostensibly the decision was made on ‘environmental’ and altruistic grounds, what the rest of the world does not yet realise is that the ‘ban’ seems to have come about as an act of malice and revenge against a company wishing to set up a new business and several shops in the town of just 2,500 people.

The ‘Bundy on Tap’ campaign came about for two reasons: (1) Sydney company Norlex Holdings’ proposal to extract ground water for bottling, which locals have opposed on the grounds that it is “their water”. (2) The same company’s proposal to build a large warehouse and adjoining shops in the town, which the local shopkeepers have opposed on selfish economic grounds.

So what you have is the shopowners’ ridiculous reaction against Norlex (who are proposing to bring benefits to the town) by banning the type of product they sell – i.e. bottled water. The obscenity of the move is highlighted by the fact that the shopkeepers who are banning the water will still be selling crap products like fizzy soft drinks in similar plastic containers, whereas the Norlex product is at least a healthy one.

The idea to ban the sale of bottled water was the brainchild of Bundanoon bike shop owner Huw Kingston and was put to a community meeting of more than 350 people last night with only two people voting against the proposed ban. 

One local resident was brave enough to voice his opposition and I agree with him: “There’s a far bigger health issue, which is the diabetes issue and if we’re taking away water at the point of sale that is full of sugar drinks I think we’re on the wrong track,” he said, in a clear reference to the hypocrisyof the decision.

Whether or not the accidental publicity generated by this incident benefits Bundanoon’s tourism popularity in the long run remains to be seen. I think there might be a short term boost but gimmicks like this are unlikely to sustain interest in the longer term. 

The bigger issue to me is what makes people like Mr Kingston and his fellow shopkeepers think they can tell others how they should live and what products they should consume?

While I also think the pre-packaged bottled water ‘craze’ is over-the-top, a waste of resources and a rip-off, so are many other products so why pick on water, which is actually good for you and essential to your well being?

What the good folk of Bundanoon have done is to ‘ban’ the sale of a healthy product but not other beverages that also come in plastic bottles like fizzy, sugar-laden soft drinks that are a leading cause of obesity among children.

This is turn-back-the-clock stuff and it’s the type of thinking that is pervading the minds of many people who live in small towns like Bunadoon and, yes, even here in Bright where we’ve had similar proposals put forward by both the ‘Save Bright’‘Cittaslow’ nutters.

Such a ban of course could not be legally enforced and, if formally adopted, may even contravene the Trade Practices Act. The local water authorities also sell the water that comes through the taps so the manufacturers of bottled water may have a case to say they’re being unfairly discriminated against.

But underlying all this ‘consumer action’ in Bundanoon is the desire to keep a new business out of their precious little town. The Norlex company that has applied to pump water out of a local aquifer (i.e. ground water, not from the local supply) is ALSO applying to build new shops in the town, a move that other shop owners have – surprise, surprise - vehemently opposed.

Remind you anything? Well, if you’ve read this website it sounds much like the actions of our own ‘wonderful’ and ‘community-minded’ organisation Save Bright, who vehemently opposed the Coles (now Woolies) supermarket development. Save Bright too was driven by existing shopkeepers.

It just shows you that small towns are much the same. The only difference here is that Bundanoon have gone about their crazy ban more effectively and professionally than what Save Bright did in their campaign and have generated what seems to be some positive publicity.

My guess though, is that this new found fame will be short-lived and they may yet regret their head-in-the-sand reaction to a new business trying to set up in their precious little ‘paradise’.

22 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Baldrick said, on 9 July, 2009 at 11:47 am

    And they probably still buy their fizzy drinks and other consumables in plastic bags.

  2. Don said, on 9 July, 2009 at 1:00 pm

    Nice investigative journalism there Ray. I thought, “how interesting” when I saw this on TV this morning and as you say, there’s was no mention of the true reason why. Nolex could do well if they took this to ACA or TT. Could create a nice black market for dodgy water bottle dealers.

  3. Bob Thomas said, on 9 July, 2009 at 2:16 pm

    Boy, did Ray ever miss the mark this time! There is no “ban” on bottled water. The shopkeepers are voluntarily removing it from sale with the overwhelming support of the community. Water will still be available at points of sale, except it will be for free, instead of ripping off consumers, and it will be better quality, too.

    The only role Norlex played in this whole issue was to get people thinking about the stupidity of paying for something that was available for almost nothing, and that harmed the environment in the process. And once you think about it, you realise that there is absolutely nothing positive about bottled water except, of course, in places where the water is not safe to drink.

  4. Ray Dixon said, on 9 July, 2009 at 3:12 pm

    What’s the difference between “banning” it and “voluntarily removing it from sale”, Bob? It’s the same thing. Of course you can’t legally “ban” it, because it’s a legal product.

    I don’t think I “missed the mark”. My point is that the shopkeepers are not “voluntarily removing” more harmful products like soft drinks that are also in plastic bottles.

    A lot of people choose to buy bottled water because of the minerals, electrolytes etc that it contains. That is their choice to make. And while it might be “stupid” to pay for something that is available for nothing, like water, people have a right to buy stupid products and I dare say the “stupid” label could be applied to many other products in Bundanoon shops, not just bottled ones.

    And there’s no doubt that this action was prompted by Norlex trying to set up shop in the town.

  5. Dominic said, on 9 July, 2009 at 8:31 pm

    Bob, who are you to say that customers cannot buy bottled water in your town because YOU say the tap water is better quality? Don’t you understand that many people refuse to drink tap water for a variety of reasons? It’s not your place to impose such restrictions on people’s choices.

  6. Jon said, on 9 July, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    It is unfortunate that people in Bundanoon will now be forced to ingest Flouride filled tap water, that is by no means equal to bottled water. this is a very dangerous precendant to set and I hope no other town or states decide to follow suit.

  7. Ray Dixon said, on 9 July, 2009 at 11:35 pm

    Yes, that’s just one of the points, Jon. This idea may actually work against Bundanoon’s tourism interests because tourists do not like to be restricted in their choices.

  8. PKD said, on 10 July, 2009 at 8:58 pm

    I’d have to say Ray, that just because the townspeople may not have had honourable intentions, they’ve ended up with a good policy.

    Bottled water is a lousy idea – full stop. There are plenty of reasons why you shouldn’t buy the stufff. So Just because they didn’t ban it for the better reasons, well… at least they banned it!

  9. Ray Dixon said, on 10 July, 2009 at 9:18 pm

    I agree it’s a dumb product, PKD … for me and you. But obviously not for a lot of people. What do we do, ban all “lousy products”?

  10. Ray Dixon said, on 10 July, 2009 at 10:04 pm

    You’d be the first to ban Microsoft, Dave.

  11. Dave from Albury said, on 10 July, 2009 at 10:51 pm

    I’d give Microsoft another chance, they do have the ability to make great products, but have frequently failed to deliver since the early 90’s.

    Things I’d ban, in no particular order: Diet soft drinks, kitchen appliances advertised on morning TV, wireless speakers, modern American cars, premium audio/visual cables, decaffeinated coffee, low fat yogurt, the Channel Nine cricket commentary team, botox, anti-bacterial cleaning products, pre-mixed spirits in a can, real dolls, foul smelling “air purifiers”, rice cookers, clothing for dogs, tracksuits that come in matching men’s and women’s versions, and celebrity autobiographies.

  12. Ray Dixon said, on 10 July, 2009 at 11:41 pm

    I’d ban Twitter.

  13. Jon said, on 11 July, 2009 at 10:07 pm

    I did the sums, approx. 12 times more plastic bottles are sold for soft drinks than bottled water. Not to mention bottled water is a lot healthy than soft Drinks.

  14. PKD said, on 11 July, 2009 at 10:10 pm

    Things to ban?

    Plastic bags, light bulbs (already been done?), botteld water, step dancing….

  15. Jon said, on 13 July, 2009 at 7:38 pm

    Ban Politicians ??

  16. roxannatas said, on 14 July, 2009 at 6:59 am

    Are there many in Bright?

  17. Ray Dixon said, on 14 July, 2009 at 10:31 am

    Only Sophie.

  18. PabloDee said, on 27 September, 2009 at 3:29 am

    How dumb is this argument !!! … If water is not available people just choose another drink …very few people will decide not to buy a drink if there is no bottled water for sale … and offering tap water won’t work because it tastes awful compared to bottled water … are people SO desperate to appear to be saving the environment that they ignore common sense … I am just amazed people will jump on the bandwagon and agre with initiatives like this when it’s blatently obvious it will have no effect …. rediculous ideas like this take the focus off ideas that could actually make a diffrence …. I’m still shaking my head at this one !!!!

  19. WAYNE E said, on 28 September, 2009 at 11:00 pm

    It’s been intersting to note just how poorly this has been reported. Yes it’s true that Norlex want to mine water, and it is equally true that the townsfolk of Bundanoon do not want it mined. But that’s because the aquifier is located half a kilometer away from the village, down one of the steepest roads you could imagine, near the entrance to the national park. Between the village and the mine site is the primary school, past which 400 large truch movements a day would occur if the site goes ahead. Near the aquifier is a glow-worm glen (which relies on moisture), while a string of semi rural properties line the incline. 400 truck movements out though a road which runs up the small main street…..
    As for the water. We are all thrilled that we can walk up to a filtered bubblers scattered throughout the town and the school, drink to our hearts content, or fill our Bundy Water bottles. If that’s your idea of jumping on the bandwagon, or being delusional …or doing without…. then we’ll take it anyday.

  20. Ray Dixon said, on 28 September, 2009 at 11:08 pm

    Wayne, there’s nothing wrong with your first paragraph. Yes, protest the extraction of your ground water by all means and make a big deal about it. I agree with that.

    But where do you get off banning the sale of all bottled water from your shops? That’s just going too far.

  21. waynee said, on 30 September, 2009 at 9:03 pm

    Ray, we’re not “getting off” on banning bottled water. Personally, I couldn’t care less if we continued to sell bottled water or not, as I’ve never bought the stuff. But the filtered bubblers installed at the primary school and around town are absolutely fantastic, and to see the kids drinking from them first thing in the morning is a refreshing sight. They wouldn’t be there but for this initiative.
    But back to the ban. You’re right, eventually water may be sold again if the demand is there. We’ll see – and that’s fine too. But that’s not the point right now. The point is that most residents have felt completely helpless when it comes to the Norlex issue ie it will be a matter which is decided in court on legal principles…. not necessarily driven by what we would see as common sense.

    So this is all about establishing some control both on a personal and community basis and sending a clear message about how we feel abou the issue. And yes we could have done a PR campaign on the court case, but that “issue” would have had a one week life and died with the press. In terms of appreciating the issues (as you’ve pointed them out), be assured that we do, just as you can be assured that many of us are pro-development, and not just blindly opposing this. But if you looked at this site first-hand I think you’d walk away shaking your head (like we have) with the same attitude, ie we’ve got to take control somehow (even if through a side issue) and take some action (and not just put up “don’t mine our water” signs in our front yards)
    As someone who’s watched it play out from the sidelines, I think it has been a really clever strategy. As for the final result on the ban…no doubt people will end up doing what suits them….

  22. Ray Dixon said, on 30 September, 2009 at 11:03 pm

    Waynee, you seem to have a different definition of “getting off” to me. I meant, what gives you in Bundanoon the right to ban a perfectly good product (bottled water) just because you don’t like the actions of one manufacturer, Norlex? You are still allowing the sale of all other beverages in plastic bottles such as crappy and unhealthy soft drinks, so don’t try to claim it’s on environmental or health grounds.

    I think you people have acted vindicatively and, in so doing, have turned this issue against yourselves. You need to be fair if you want to make a point, and you are being inherently unfair and downright small-minded. I certainly wouldn’t visit your town while you hold such a high-handed position on the issue. Fight it by all means, but don’t be hypocrites.


Leave a Reply